Home GPU Comparison AMD Instinct MI300A vs NVIDIA Quadro 2000M

AMD Instinct MI300A vs NVIDIA Quadro 2000M

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 128GB VRAM AMD Instinct MI300A and 2GB VRAM Quadro 2000M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Instinct MI300A 's Advantages
Released 12 years and 11 months late
Boost Clock2100MHz
More VRAM (128GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (5300GB/s vs 28.80GB/s)
14400 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro 2000M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (55W vs 760W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
AMD Instinct MI300A +28952%
122.6 TFLOPS
Quadro 2000M
0.422 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Dec 2023
Release Date
Jan 2011
Instinct
Generation
Quadro Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 5.0 x16
Bus Interface
MXM-A (3.0)

Clock Speeds

1000 MHz
Base Clock
-
2100 MHz
Boost Clock
-
5200 MHz
Memory Clock
900 MHz

Memory

128GB
Memory Size
2GB
HBM3
Memory Type
DDR3
8192bit
Memory Bus
128bit
5300GB/s
Bandwidth
28.80GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
4
228
Compute Units
-
14592
Shading Units
192
880
TMUs
32
0
ROPs
16
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
16 MB
L2 Cache
256 KB

Theoretical Performance

0 MPixel/s
Pixel Rate
4.400 GPixel/s
1496 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
17.60 GTexel/s
980.6 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
122.6 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
422.4 GFLOPS
61.3 TFLOPS
FP64 (double)
35.20 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

MI300
GPU Name
GF106
-
GPU Variant
N12P-Q3
CDNA 3.0
Architecture
Fermi
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
5 nm
Process Size
40 nm
146 billion
Transistors
1.17 billion
1017 mm²
Die Size
238 mm²

Board Design

760W
TDP
55W
1000 W
Suggested PSU
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
-

Graphics Features

N/A
DirectX
12 (11_0)
N/A
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
2.1
N/A
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy