Home GPU Comparison AMD Instinct MI300A vs NVIDIA GRID RTX T10 16

AMD Instinct MI300A vs NVIDIA GRID RTX T10 16

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 128GB VRAM AMD Instinct MI300A and 16GB VRAM GRID RTX T10 16 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Instinct MI300A 's Advantages
Boost Clock has increased by 51% (2100MHz vs 1395MHz)
More VRAM (128GB vs 16GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (5300GB/s vs 604.8GB/s)
9984 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA GRID RTX T10 16 's Advantages
Lower TDP (260W vs 760W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
AMD Instinct MI300A +853%
122.6 TFLOPS
GRID RTX T10 16
12.86 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Dec 2023
Release Date
Unknown
Instinct
Generation
GRID
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 5.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1000 MHz
Base Clock
1065 MHz
2100 MHz
Boost Clock
1395 MHz
5200 MHz
Memory Clock
1575 MHz

Memory

128GB
Memory Size
16GB
HBM3
Memory Type
GDDR6
8192bit
Memory Bus
384bit
5300GB/s
Bandwidth
604.8GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
72
228
Compute Units
-
14592
Shading Units
4608
880
TMUs
288
0
ROPs
96
-
Tensor Cores
576
-
RT Cores
72
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
16 MB
L2 Cache
6 MB

Theoretical Performance

0 MPixel/s
Pixel Rate
133.9 GPixel/s
1496 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
401.8 GTexel/s
980.6 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
25.71 TFLOPS
122.6 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
12.86 TFLOPS
61.3 TFLOPS
FP64 (double)
401.8 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

MI300
GPU Name
TU102
-
GPU Variant
TU102-875-A1
CDNA 3.0
Architecture
Turing
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
5 nm
Process Size
12 nm
146 billion
Transistors
18.6 billion
1017 mm²
Die Size
754 mm²

Board Design

760W
TDP
260W
1000 W
Suggested PSU
600 W
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

Graphics Features

N/A
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
N/A
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
7.5
N/A
Shader Model
6.6

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy