Home GPU Comparison AMD Instinct MI300A vs Intel Data Center GPU Max Subsystem

AMD Instinct MI300A vs Intel Data Center GPU Max Subsystem

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 128GB VRAM AMD Instinct MI300A and 128GB VRAM Data Center GPU Max Subsystem to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Instinct MI300A 's Advantages
Released 11 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 31% (2100MHz vs 1600MHz)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (5300GB/s vs 3205GB/s)
Lower TDP (760W vs 2400W)
Intel Data Center GPU Max Subsystem 's Advantages
1792 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
AMD Instinct MI300A +133%
122.6 TFLOPS
Data Center GPU Max Subsystem
52.43 TFLOPS

Graphics Card

Dec 2023
Release Date
Jan 2023
Instinct
Generation
Data Center GPU
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 5.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 5.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1000 MHz
Base Clock
900 MHz
2100 MHz
Boost Clock
1600 MHz
5200 MHz
Memory Clock
1565 MHz

Memory

128GB
Memory Size
128GB
HBM3
Memory Type
HBM2e
8192bit
Memory Bus
8192bit
5300GB/s
Bandwidth
3205GB/s

Render Config

228
Compute Units
-
-
-
-
14592
Shading Units
16384
880
TMUs
1024
0
ROPs
0
-
Tensor Cores
1024
-
RT Cores
128
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per EU)
16 MB
L2 Cache
408 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

0 MPixel/s
Pixel Rate
0 MPixel/s
1496 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
1638 GTexel/s
980.6 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
52.43 TFLOPS
122.6 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
52.43 TFLOPS
61.3 TFLOPS
FP64 (double)
52.43 TFLOPS

Board Design

760W
TDP
2400W
1000 W
Suggested PSU
2800 W
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
1x 16-pin

Graphics Processor

MI300
GPU Name
Ponte Vecchio
-
-
-
CDNA 3.0
Architecture
Generation 12.5
TSMC
Foundry
Intel
5 nm
Process Size
10 nm
146 billion
Transistors
100 billion
1017 mm²
Die Size
1280 mm²

Graphics Features

N/A
DirectX
12 (12_1)
N/A
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
-
-
-
N/A
Shader Model
6.6
© 2025 - TopCPU.net