NVIDIA A2 vs NVIDIA NVS 310
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 16GB VRAM A2 and 512MB VRAM NVS 310 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA A2 's Advantages
Released 9 years and 5 months late
Boost Clock1770MHz
More VRAM (16GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (200.1GB/s vs 14.00GB/s)
1232 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA NVS 310 's Advantages
Lower TDP (20W vs 60W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
A2
+4431%
4.531 TFLOPS
NVS 310
0.1 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Nov 2021
Release Date
Jun 2012
Quadro
Generation
NVS
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x8
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1440 MHz
Base Clock
-
1770 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1563 MHz
Memory Clock
875 MHz
Memory
16GB
Memory Size
512MB
GDDR6
Memory Type
DDR3
128bit
Memory Bus
64bit
200.1GB/s
Bandwidth
14.00GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
10
SM Count
1
1280
Shading Units
48
40
TMUs
8
32
ROPs
4
40
Tensor Cores
-
10
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
2 MB
L2 Cache
128 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
56.64 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
1.046 GPixel/s
70.80 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
4.184 GTexel/s
4.531 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
4.531 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
100.4 GFLOPS
70.80 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
8.368 GFLOPS
Board Design
60W
TDP
20W
250 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
No outputs
Outputs
2x DisplayPort
None
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
GA107
GPU Name
GF119
-
GPU Variant
GF119-825-A1
Ampere
Architecture
Fermi 2.0
Samsung
Foundry
TSMC
8 nm
Process Size
40 nm
Unknown
Transistors
0.292 billion
Unknown
Die Size
79 mm²
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
8.6
CUDA
2.1
6.6
Shader Model
5.1
