NVIDIA A2 vs NVIDIA GeForce 210 Rev. 2
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 16GB VRAM A2 and 1024MB VRAM GeForce 210 Rev. 2 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA A2 's Advantages
Released 12 years and 1 months late
Boost Clock1770MHz
More VRAM (16GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (200.1GB/s vs 6.400GB/s)
1264 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA GeForce 210 Rev. 2 's Advantages
Lower TDP (31W vs 60W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
A2
+11517%
4.531 TFLOPS
GeForce 210 Rev. 2
0.039 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Nov 2021
Release Date
Oct 2009
Quadro
Generation
GeForce 200
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x8
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1440 MHz
Base Clock
-
1770 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1563 MHz
Memory Clock
400 MHz
Memory
16GB
Memory Size
1024MB
GDDR6
Memory Type
DDR3
128bit
Memory Bus
64bit
200.1GB/s
Bandwidth
6.400GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
10
SM Count
2
1280
Shading Units
16
40
TMUs
8
32
ROPs
4
40
Tensor Cores
-
10
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
2 MB
L2 Cache
32 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
56.64 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
2.080 GPixel/s
70.80 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
4.160 GTexel/s
4.531 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
4.531 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
39.36 GFLOPS
70.80 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-
Board Design
60W
TDP
31W
250 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
No outputs
Outputs
1x DVI
1x DisplayPort
1x VGA
None
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
GA107
GPU Name
GT218
-
GPU Variant
GT218-325-B1
Ampere
Architecture
Tesla 2.0
Samsung
Foundry
TSMC
8 nm
Process Size
40 nm
Unknown
Transistors
0.26 billion
Unknown
Die Size
57 mm²
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
11.1 (10_1)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
8.6
CUDA
1.2
6.6
Shader Model
4.1
