NVIDIA A2 vs NVIDIA GeForce 8800 GS
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 16GB VRAM A2 and 384MB VRAM GeForce 8800 GS to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA A2 's Advantages
Released 13 years and 10 months late
Boost Clock1770MHz
More VRAM (16GB vs 384GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (200.1GB/s vs 38.40GB/s)
1184 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (60W vs 105W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
A2
+1616%
4.531 TFLOPS
GeForce 8800 GS
0.264 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Nov 2021
Release Date
Jan 2008
Quadro
Generation
GeForce 8
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x8
Bus Interface
PCIe 1.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1440 MHz
Base Clock
-
1770 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1563 MHz
Memory Clock
800 MHz
Memory
16GB
Memory Size
384MB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR3
128bit
Memory Bus
192bit
200.1GB/s
Bandwidth
38.40GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
10
SM Count
12
1280
Shading Units
96
40
TMUs
48
32
ROPs
12
40
Tensor Cores
-
10
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
2 MB
L2 Cache
48 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
56.64 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
6.600 GPixel/s
70.80 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
26.40 GTexel/s
4.531 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
4.531 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
264.0 GFLOPS
70.80 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-
Board Design
60W
TDP
105W
250 W
Suggested PSU
300 W
No outputs
Outputs
2x DVI
1x S-Video
None
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin
Graphics Processor
GA107
GPU Name
G92
-
GPU Variant
G92-150-A2
Ampere
Architecture
Tesla
Samsung
Foundry
TSMC
8 nm
Process Size
65 nm
Unknown
Transistors
0.754 billion
Unknown
Die Size
324 mm²
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
8.6
CUDA
1.1
6.6
Shader Model
4.0
