NVIDIA A2 vs ATI FirePro V4900
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 16GB VRAM A2 and 1024MB VRAM FirePro V4900 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA A2 's Advantages
Released 10 years late
Boost Clock1770MHz
More VRAM (16GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (200.1GB/s vs 64.00GB/s)
800 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (60W vs 75W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
A2
+489%
4.531 TFLOPS
FirePro V4900
0.768 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Nov 2021
Release Date
Nov 2011
Quadro
Generation
FirePro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x8
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1440 MHz
Base Clock
-
1770 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1563 MHz
Memory Clock
1000 MHz
Memory
16GB
Memory Size
1024MB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
128bit
200.1GB/s
Bandwidth
64.00GB/s
Render Config
-
Compute Units
6
10
SM Count
-
1280
Shading Units
480
40
TMUs
24
32
ROPs
8
40
Tensor Cores
-
10
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
8 KB (per CU)
2 MB
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
56.64 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
6.400 GPixel/s
70.80 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
19.20 GTexel/s
4.531 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
4.531 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
768.0 GFLOPS
70.80 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-
Board Design
60W
TDP
75W
250 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
No outputs
Outputs
1x DVI
2x DisplayPort 1.1
None
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
GA107
GPU Name
Turks
-
GPU Variant
Turks XT GL
Ampere
Architecture
TeraScale 2
Samsung
Foundry
TSMC
8 nm
Process Size
40 nm
Unknown
Transistors
0.716 billion
Unknown
Die Size
118 mm²
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
11.2 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.4
3.0
OpenCL
1.2
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
8.6
CUDA
-
6.6
Shader Model
5.0
