NVIDIA A2 vs ATI FirePro 2460 Multi View
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 16GB VRAM A2 and 512MB VRAM FirePro 2460 Multi View to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA A2 's Advantages
Released 11 years and 7 months late
Boost Clock1770MHz
More VRAM (16GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (200.1GB/s vs 32.00GB/s)
1200 additional rendering cores
ATI FirePro 2460 Multi View 's Advantages
Lower TDP (17W vs 60W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
A2
+5563%
4.531 TFLOPS
FirePro 2460 Multi View
0.08 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Nov 2021
Release Date
Apr 2010
Quadro
Generation
FirePro Multi-View
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x8
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1440 MHz
Base Clock
-
1770 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1563 MHz
Memory Clock
500 MHz
Memory
16GB
Memory Size
512MB
GDDR6
Memory Type
DDR3
128bit
Memory Bus
256bit
200.1GB/s
Bandwidth
32.00GB/s
Render Config
-
Compute Units
1
10
SM Count
-
1280
Shading Units
80
40
TMUs
8
32
ROPs
4
40
Tensor Cores
-
10
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
2 MB
L2 Cache
-
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
56.64 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
2.000 GPixel/s
70.80 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
4.000 GTexel/s
4.531 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
4.531 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
80.00 GFLOPS
70.80 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-
Board Design
60W
TDP
17W
250 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
No outputs
Outputs
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.1
None
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
GA107
GPU Name
Cedar
-
GPU Variant
Cedar GL
Ampere
Architecture
TeraScale 2
Samsung
Foundry
TSMC
8 nm
Process Size
40 nm
Unknown
Transistors
0.292 billion
Unknown
Die Size
59 mm²
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
11.2 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.4
3.0
OpenCL
1.2
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
8.6
CUDA
-
6.6
Shader Model
5.0
