Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA A10M vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 1700M

NVIDIA A10M vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 1700M

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 24GB VRAM A10M and 512MB VRAM Quadro FX 1700M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA A10M 's Advantages
Released 13 years and 4 months late
Boost Clock1635MHz
Larger VRAM bandwidth (600.2GB/s vs 25.60GB/s)
7136 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro FX 1700M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (50W vs 150W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
A10M +23576%
23.44 TFLOPS
Quadro FX 1700M
0.099 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Feb 2022
Release Date
Oct 2008
Tesla Ampere
Generation
Quadro FX Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
MXM-II

Clock Speeds

975 MHz
Base Clock
-
1635 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1563 MHz
Memory Clock
800 MHz

Memory

24GB
Memory Size
512MB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR3
384bit
Memory Bus
128bit
600.2GB/s
Bandwidth
25.60GB/s

Render Config

56
SM Count
4
-
Compute Units
-
7168
Shading Units
32
224
TMUs
16
80
ROPs
8
224
Tensor Cores
-
56
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
6 MB
L2 Cache
32 KB

Theoretical Performance

130.8 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
5.000 GPixel/s
366.2 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
10.00 GTexel/s
23.44 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
23.44 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
99.20 GFLOPS
732.5 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Graphics Processor

GA102
GPU Name
G96
-
GPU Variant
NB9P-GLM
Ampere
Architecture
Tesla
Samsung
Foundry
UMC
8 nm
Process Size
65 nm
28.3 billion
Transistors
0.314 billion
628 mm²
Die Size
144 mm²

Board Design

150W
TDP
50W
450 W
Suggested PSU
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
8-pin EPS
Power Connectors
-

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
8.6
CUDA
1.1
6.7
Shader Model
4.0

Related GPU Comparisons

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy