NVIDIA A10M vs NVIDIA Quadro CX
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 24GB VRAM A10M and 1536MB VRAM Quadro CX to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA A10M 's Advantages
Released 13 years and 3 months late
Boost Clock1635MHz
More VRAM (24GB vs 1536GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (600.2GB/s vs 76.80GB/s)
6976 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
A10M
+4973%
23.44 TFLOPS
Quadro CX
0.462 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Feb 2022
Release Date
Nov 2008
Tesla Ampere
Generation
Quadro CX
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
975 MHz
Base Clock
-
1635 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1563 MHz
Memory Clock
800 MHz
Memory
24GB
Memory Size
1536MB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR3
384bit
Memory Bus
384bit
600.2GB/s
Bandwidth
76.80GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
56
SM Count
24
7168
Shading Units
192
224
TMUs
64
80
ROPs
24
224
Tensor Cores
-
56
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
6 MB
L2 Cache
192 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
130.8 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
14.45 GPixel/s
366.2 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
38.53 GTexel/s
23.44 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
23.44 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
462.3 GFLOPS
732.5 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
57.79 GFLOPS
Board Design
150W
TDP
150W
450 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
No outputs
Outputs
1x DVI
2x DisplayPort
1x S-Video
8-pin EPS
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin
Graphics Processor
GA102
GPU Name
GT200B
-
-
-
Ampere
Architecture
Tesla 2.0
Samsung
Foundry
TSMC
8 nm
Process Size
55 nm
28.3 billion
Transistors
1.4 billion
628 mm²
Die Size
470 mm²
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
8.6
CUDA
1.3
6.7
Shader Model
4.0
