Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA A100 PCIe 80 GB vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 880M

NVIDIA A100 PCIe 80 GB vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 880M

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 80GB VRAM A100 PCIe 80 GB and 1024MB VRAM Quadro FX 880M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA A100 PCIe 80 GB 's Advantages
Released 11 years and 5 months late
Boost Clock1410MHz
More VRAM (80GB vs 1GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (1935GB/s vs 25.28GB/s)
6864 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro FX 880M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (35W vs 300W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
A100 PCIe 80 GB +16701%
19.49 TFLOPS
Quadro FX 880M
0.116 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jun 2021
Release Date
Jan 2010
Tesla Ampere
Generation
Quadro FX Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
MXM-A (3.0)

Clock Speeds

1065 MHz
Base Clock
-
1410 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1512 MHz
Memory Clock
790 MHz

Memory

80GB
Memory Size
1024MB
HBM2e
Memory Type
GDDR3
5120bit
Memory Bus
128bit
1935GB/s
Bandwidth
25.28GB/s

Render Config

108
SM Count
6
-
Compute Units
-
6912
Shading Units
48
432
TMUs
16
160
ROPs
8
432
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
192 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
80 MB
L2 Cache
64 KB

Theoretical Performance

225.6 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
4.400 GPixel/s
609.1 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
8.800 GTexel/s
77.97 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
19.49 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
116.2 GFLOPS
9.746 TFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Graphics Processor

GA100
GPU Name
GT216
-
GPU Variant
N10P-GLM
Ampere
Architecture
Tesla 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
7 nm
Process Size
40 nm
54.2 billion
Transistors
0.486 billion
826 mm²
Die Size
100 mm²

Board Design

300W
TDP
35W
700 W
Suggested PSU
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
8-pin EPS
Power Connectors
-

Graphics Features

N/A
DirectX
11.1 (10_1)
N/A
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
8.0
CUDA
1.2
N/A
Shader Model
4.1

Related GPU Comparisons

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy