NVIDIA A10 PCIe vs NVIDIA Quadro K4000M
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 24GB VRAM A10 PCIe and 4GB VRAM Quadro K4000M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA A10 PCIe 's Advantages
Released 8 years and 10 months late
Boost Clock1695MHz
More VRAM (24GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (600.2GB/s vs 89.60GB/s)
8256 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro K4000M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (100W vs 150W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
A10 PCIe
+2607%
31.24 TFLOPS
Quadro K4000M
1.154 TFLOPS
Blender
A10 PCIe
+2564%
2505
Quadro K4000M
94
Graphics Card
Apr 2021
Release Date
Jun 2012
Tesla
Generation
Quadro Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
MXM-B (3.0)
Clock Speeds
885 MHz
Base Clock
-
1695 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1563 MHz
Memory Clock
700 MHz
Memory
24GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR5
384bit
Memory Bus
256bit
600.2GB/s
Bandwidth
89.60GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
72
SM Count
-
9216
Shading Units
960
288
TMUs
80
96
ROPs
32
288
Tensor Cores
-
72
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per SMX)
6 MB
L2 Cache
512 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
162.7 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
12.02 GPixel/s
488.2 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
48.08 GTexel/s
31.24 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
31.24 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1154 GFLOPS
976.3 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
48.08 GFLOPS
Board Design
150W
TDP
100W
450 W
Suggested PSU
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
-
Graphics Processor
GA102
GPU Name
GK104
GA102-890-A1
GPU Variant
N14E-Q3-A2
Ampere
Architecture
Kepler
Samsung
Foundry
TSMC
8 nm
Process Size
28 nm
28.3 billion
Transistors
3.54 billion
628 mm²
Die Size
294 mm²
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.1
8.6
CUDA
3.0
6.6
Shader Model
5.1
