Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA A10 PCIe vs NVIDIA Quadro K620M

NVIDIA A10 PCIe vs NVIDIA Quadro K620M

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 24GB VRAM A10 PCIe and 2GB VRAM Quadro K620M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA A10 PCIe 's Advantages
Released 6 years and 1 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 51% (1695MHz vs 1124MHz)
More VRAM (24GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (600.2GB/s vs 14.40GB/s)
8832 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro K620M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (30W vs 150W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
A10 PCIe +3519%
31.24 TFLOPS
Quadro K620M
0.863 TFLOPS
Blender
A10 PCIe +2954%
2505
Quadro K620M
82
VS

Graphics Card

Apr 2021
Release Date
Mar 2015
Tesla
Generation
Quadro Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
MXM-A (3.0)

Clock Speeds

885 MHz
Base Clock
1029 MHz
1695 MHz
Boost Clock
1124 MHz
1563 MHz
Memory Clock
900 MHz

Memory

24GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
DDR3
384bit
Memory Bus
64bit
600.2GB/s
Bandwidth
14.40GB/s

Render Config

72
SM Count
-
-
Compute Units
-
9216
Shading Units
384
288
TMUs
16
96
ROPs
8
288
Tensor Cores
-
72
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SMM)
6 MB
L2 Cache
1024 KB

Theoretical Performance

162.7 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
8.992 GPixel/s
488.2 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
17.98 GTexel/s
31.24 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
31.24 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
863.2 GFLOPS
976.3 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
26.98 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

GA102
GPU Name
GM108
GA102-890-A1
GPU Variant
N15M-Q3
Ampere
Architecture
Maxwell
Samsung
Foundry
TSMC
8 nm
Process Size
28 nm
28.3 billion
Transistors
Unknown
628 mm²
Die Size
Unknown

Board Design

150W
TDP
30W
450 W
Suggested PSU
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
8.6
CUDA
5.0
6.6
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy