NVIDIA A10 PCIe vs NVIDIA Quadro NVS 290
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 24GB VRAM A10 PCIe and 256MB VRAM Quadro NVS 290 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA A10 PCIe 's Advantages
Released 13 years and 6 months late
Boost Clock1695MHz
More VRAM (24GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (600.2GB/s vs 6.400GB/s)
9200 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro NVS 290 's Advantages
Lower TDP (21W vs 150W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
A10 PCIe
+107624%
31.24 TFLOPS
Quadro NVS 290
0.029 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Apr 2021
Release Date
Oct 2007
Tesla
Generation
Quadro NVS
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 1.0 x16
Clock Speeds
885 MHz
Base Clock
-
1695 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1563 MHz
Memory Clock
400 MHz
Memory
24GB
Memory Size
256MB
GDDR6
Memory Type
DDR2
384bit
Memory Bus
64bit
600.2GB/s
Bandwidth
6.400GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
72
SM Count
2
9216
Shading Units
16
288
TMUs
8
96
ROPs
4
288
Tensor Cores
-
72
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
6 MB
L2 Cache
16 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
162.7 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
1.836 GPixel/s
488.2 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
3.672 GTexel/s
31.24 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
31.24 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
29.38 GFLOPS
976.3 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-
Board Design
150W
TDP
21W
450 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
No outputs
Outputs
1x DMS-59
1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
GA102
GPU Name
G86
GA102-890-A1
GPU Variant
-
Ampere
Architecture
Tesla
Samsung
Foundry
TSMC
8 nm
Process Size
80 nm
28.3 billion
Transistors
0.21 billion
628 mm²
Die Size
127 mm²
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
8.6
CUDA
1.1
6.6
Shader Model
4.0
