Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA A10 PCIe vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 1700 Mac Edition

NVIDIA A10 PCIe vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 1700 Mac Edition

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 24GB VRAM A10 PCIe and 512MB VRAM Quadro FX 1700 Mac Edition to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA A10 PCIe 's Advantages
Released 12 years and 7 months late
Boost Clock1695MHz
More VRAM (24GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (600.2GB/s vs 20.80GB/s)
9184 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro FX 1700 Mac Edition 's Advantages
Lower TDP (42W vs 150W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
A10 PCIe +46526%
31.24 TFLOPS
Quadro FX 1700 Mac Edition
0.067 TFLOPS

Graphics Card

Apr 2021
Release Date
Sep 2008
Tesla
Generation
Quadro FX
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 1.0 x16

Clock Speeds

885 MHz
Base Clock
-
1695 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1563 MHz
Memory Clock
650 MHz

Memory

24GB
Memory Size
512MB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR3
384bit
Memory Bus
128bit
600.2GB/s
Bandwidth
20.80GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
72
SM Count
4
9216
Shading Units
32
288
TMUs
16
96
ROPs
8
288
Tensor Cores
-
72
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
6 MB
L2 Cache
32 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

162.7 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
4.160 GPixel/s
488.2 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
8.320 GTexel/s
31.24 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
31.24 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
66.56 GFLOPS
976.3 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

150W
TDP
42W
450 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
No outputs
Outputs
2x DVI 1x S-Video
1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

GA102
GPU Name
G84
GA102-890-A1
GPU Variant
-
Ampere
Architecture
Tesla
Samsung
Foundry
TSMC
8 nm
Process Size
80 nm
28.3 billion
Transistors
0.289 billion
628 mm²
Die Size
169 mm²

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
8.6
CUDA
1.1
6.6
Shader Model
4.0
© 2025 - TopCPU.net