NVIDIA P106 100 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 6GB VRAM P106 100 and 4GB VRAM GeForce GTX 1650 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA P106 100 's Advantages
Boost Clock has increased by 3% (1709MHz vs 1665MHz)
More VRAM (6GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (192.2GB/s vs 128.1GB/s)
384 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 's Advantages
Released 1 years and 10 months late
Lower TDP (75W vs 120W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
P106 100
+46%
4.375 TFLOPS
GeForce GTX 1650
2.984 TFLOPS
3DMark Time Spy
P106 100
+14%
4068
GeForce GTX 1650
3566
3DMark Time Spy Extreme
P106 100
+16%
1866
GeForce GTX 1650
1606
Graphics Card
Jun 2017
Release Date
Apr 2019
Mining GPUs
Generation
GeForce 16
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 1.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1506 MHz
Base Clock
1485 MHz
1709 MHz
Boost Clock
1665 MHz
2002 MHz
Memory Clock
2001 MHz
Memory
6GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
192bit
Memory Bus
128bit
192.2GB/s
Bandwidth
128.1GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
10
SM Count
14
1280
Shading Units
896
80
TMUs
56
48
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
48 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
1536 KB
L2 Cache
1024 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
82.03 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
53.28 GPixel/s
136.7 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
93.24 GTexel/s
68.36 GFLOPS
FP16 (half)
5.967 TFLOPS
4.375 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.984 TFLOPS
136.7 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
93.24 GFLOPS
Board Design
120W
TDP
75W
300 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
No outputs
Outputs
1x DVI
1x HDMI 2.0
1x DisplayPort 1.4a
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
GP106
GPU Name
TU117
GP106-100-A1
GPU Variant
TU117-300-A1
Pascal
Architecture
Turing
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
16 nm
Process Size
12 nm
4.4 billion
Transistors
4.7 billion
200 mm²
Die Size
200 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
6.1
CUDA
7.5
6.8
Shader Model
6.6
