NVIDIA GeForce MX450 25W vs AMD Radeon 780M
We compared a Mobile platform GPU: 2GB VRAM GeForce MX450 25W and a Integrated graphics card GPU: 0System Shared VRAM Radeon 780M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA GeForce MX450 25W 's Advantages
128 additional rendering cores
AMD Radeon 780M 's Advantages
Released 3 years and 5 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 212% (2900MHz vs 930MHz)
Lower TDP (15W vs 25W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
GeForce MX450 25W
1.667 TFLOPS
Radeon 780M
+434%
8.909 TFLOPS
3DMark Time Spy
GeForce MX450 25W
1706
Radeon 780M
+62%
2775
3DMark Time Spy Extreme
GeForce MX450 25W
222
Radeon 780M
+496%
1324
Graphics Card
Aug 2020
Release Date
Jan 2024
GeForce MX
Generation
Navi III IGP
Mobile
Type
Integrated
PCIe 4.0 x4
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x8
Clock Speeds
720 MHz
Base Clock
800 MHz
930 MHz
Boost Clock
2900 MHz
1250 MHz
Memory Clock
System Shared
Memory
2GB
Memory Size
System Shared
GDDR6
Memory Type
System Shared
64bit
Memory Bus
System Shared
80.00GB/s
Bandwidth
System Dependent
Render Config
-
Compute Units
12
14
SM Count
-
896
Shading Units
768
56
TMUs
48
32
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
RT Cores
12
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
128 KB per Array
512 KB
L2 Cache
2 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
29.76 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
92.80 GPixel/s
52.08 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
139.2 GTexel/s
3.333 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
17.82 TFLOPS
1.667 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
8.909 TFLOPS
52.08 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
556.8 GFLOPS
Board Design
25W
TDP
15W
-
-
-
No outputs
Outputs
Motherboard Dependent
None
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
TU117
GPU Name
Phoenix
N18S-G5
GPU Variant
-
Turing
Architecture
RDNA 3.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
12 nm
Process Size
4 nm
4.7 billion
Transistors
25.39 billion
200 mm²
Die Size
178 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
2.1
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
7.5
CUDA
-
6.6
Shader Model
6.8
