ATI 3D Rage IIC PCI vs 3dfx Voodoo4-2 4200 AGP
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2MB VRAM 3D Rage IIC PCI and 16MB VRAM Voodoo4 2 4200 AGP to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
3dfx Voodoo4-2 4200 AGP 's Advantages
More VRAM (16GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (2.288GB/s vs 0.664GB/s)
Score
Graphics Card
Apr 1997
Release Date
Unknown
Rage 2
Generation
Voodoo4-2
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCI
Bus Interface
AGP 4x
Clock Speeds
-
-
-
-
-
-
83 MHz
Memory Clock
143 MHz
Memory
2MB
Memory Size
16MB
SDR
Memory Type
DDR
64bit
Memory Bus
64bit
0.664GB/s
Bandwidth
2.288GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
1
TMUs
2
1
ROPs
2
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
60.00 MPixel/s
Pixel Rate
286.0 MPixel/s
60.00 MTexel/s
Texture Rate
286.0 MTexel/s
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Board Design
Unknown
TDP
15W
200 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
1x VGA
Outputs
1x DVI
1x VGA
-
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
Rage IIC
GPU Name
VSA-101
Rage IIC PCI
(215R2PZUA21)
GPU Variant
Daytona
(355-0025-221)
Rage 2
Architecture
Voodoo Scalable
UMC
Foundry
TSMC
500 nm
Process Size
180 nm
0.005 billion
Transistors
0.014 billion
39 mm²
Die Size
112 mm²
Graphics Features
5.0
DirectX
6.0
N/A
OpenGL
1.1
N/A
OpenCL
N/A
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
-
-
-
-
-
-
