ATI 3D Rage IIC PCI vs ATI FireMV 2400 PCI
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2MB VRAM 3D Rage IIC PCI and 128MB VRAM FireMV 2400 PCI to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
ATI FireMV 2400 PCI 's Advantages
Released 10 years and 9 months late
More VRAM (128GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (16.00GB/s vs 0.664GB/s)
Score
Graphics Card
Apr 1997
Release Date
Jan 2008
Rage 2
Generation
FireMV Multi-View
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCI
Bus Interface
PCI
Clock Speeds
-
-
-
-
-
-
83 MHz
Memory Clock
500 MHz
Memory
2MB
Memory Size
128MB
SDR
Memory Type
DDR
64bit
Memory Bus
128bit
0.664GB/s
Bandwidth
16.00GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
1
TMUs
4
1
ROPs
4
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
60.00 MPixel/s
Pixel Rate
2.000 GPixel/s
60.00 MTexel/s
Texture Rate
2.000 GTexel/s
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Board Design
Unknown
TDP
20W
200 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
1x VGA
Outputs
1x VHDCI
-
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
Rage IIC
GPU Name
RV380
Rage IIC PCI
(215R2PZUA21)
GPU Variant
-
Rage 2
Architecture
Rage 9
UMC
Foundry
TSMC
500 nm
Process Size
130 nm
0.005 billion
Transistors
0.075 billion
39 mm²
Die Size
92 mm²
Graphics Features
5.0
DirectX
9.0
N/A
OpenGL
2.0
N/A
OpenCL
N/A
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
-
-
-
-
-
-
