ATI 3D Rage IIC PCI vs AMD Radeon R9 FURY X
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2MB VRAM 3D Rage IIC PCI and 4GB VRAM Radeon R9 FURY X to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
AMD Radeon R9 FURY X 's Advantages
Released 18 years and 2 months late
More VRAM (4GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (512.0GB/s vs 0.664GB/s)
4096 additional rendering cores
Score
Graphics Card
Apr 1997
Release Date
Jun 2015
Rage 2
Generation
Pirate Islands
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCI
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
-
-
-
-
-
83 MHz
Memory Clock
500 MHz
Memory
2MB
Memory Size
4GB
SDR
Memory Type
HBM
64bit
Memory Bus
4096bit
0.664GB/s
Bandwidth
512.0GB/s
Render Config
-
Compute Units
64
-
-
-
-
Shading Units
4096
1
TMUs
256
1
ROPs
64
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
-
L2 Cache
2 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
60.00 MPixel/s
Pixel Rate
67.20 GPixel/s
60.00 MTexel/s
Texture Rate
268.8 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
8.602 TFLOPS
-
FP32 (float)
8.602 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
537.6 GFLOPS
Board Design
Unknown
TDP
275W
200 W
Suggested PSU
600 W
1x VGA
Outputs
1x HDMI 1.4a
3x DisplayPort 1.2
-
Power Connectors
2x 8-pin
Graphics Processor
Rage IIC
GPU Name
Fiji
Rage IIC PCI
(215R2PZUA21)
GPU Variant
Fiji XT C8
(215-0862040)
Rage 2
Architecture
GCN 3.0
UMC
Foundry
TSMC
500 nm
Process Size
28 nm
0.005 billion
Transistors
8.9 billion
39 mm²
Die Size
596 mm²
Graphics Features
5.0
DirectX
12 (12_0)
N/A
OpenGL
4.6
N/A
OpenCL
2.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.2
-
-
-
-
Shader Model
6.3
