ATI 3D Rage IIC PCI vs AMD P30PH
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2MB VRAM 3D Rage IIC PCI and 4GB VRAM P30PH to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
AMD P30PH 's Advantages
Boost Clock1206MHz
More VRAM (4GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (268.8GB/s vs 0.664GB/s)
2048 additional rendering cores
Score
Graphics Card
Apr 1997
Release Date
Unknown
Rage 2
Generation
Mining GPUs
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCI
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
1120 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1206 MHz
83 MHz
Memory Clock
2100 MHz
Memory
2MB
Memory Size
4GB
SDR
Memory Type
GDDR5
64bit
Memory Bus
256bit
0.664GB/s
Bandwidth
268.8GB/s
Render Config
-
Compute Units
32
-
-
-
-
Shading Units
2048
1
TMUs
128
1
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
-
L2 Cache
2 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
60.00 MPixel/s
Pixel Rate
38.59 GPixel/s
60.00 MTexel/s
Texture Rate
154.4 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
4.940 TFLOPS
-
FP32 (float)
4.940 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
308.7 GFLOPS
Board Design
Unknown
TDP
180W
200 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
1x VGA
Outputs
1x HDMI 2.0b
-
Power Connectors
2x 8-pin
Graphics Processor
Rage IIC
GPU Name
Polaris 20
Rage IIC PCI
(215R2PZUA21)
GPU Variant
-
Rage 2
Architecture
GCN 4.0
UMC
Foundry
GlobalFoundries
500 nm
Process Size
14 nm
0.005 billion
Transistors
5.7 billion
39 mm²
Die Size
232 mm²
Graphics Features
5.0
DirectX
12 (12_0)
N/A
OpenGL
4.6
N/A
OpenCL
2.1
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
-
-
-
-
Shader Model
6.7
