ATI 3D Rage IIC PCI vs Intel H3C XG310
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2MB VRAM 3D Rage IIC PCI and 8GB VRAM H3C XG310 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Intel H3C XG310 's Advantages
Released 23 years and 7 months late
Boost Clock1550MHz
More VRAM (8GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (68.26GB/s vs 0.664GB/s)
768 additional rendering cores
Score
Graphics Card
Apr 1997
Release Date
Nov 2020
Rage 2
Generation
H3C Graphics
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCI
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
900 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1550 MHz
83 MHz
Memory Clock
2133 MHz
Memory
2MB
Memory Size
8GB
SDR
Memory Type
LPDDR4X
64bit
Memory Bus
128bit
0.664GB/s
Bandwidth
68.26GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Shading Units
768
1
TMUs
48
1
ROPs
24
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L2 Cache
1024 KB
-
L3 Cache
16 MB
Theoretical Performance
60.00 MPixel/s
Pixel Rate
37.20 GPixel/s
60.00 MTexel/s
Texture Rate
74.40 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
4.762 TFLOPS
-
FP32 (float)
2.381 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
595.2 GFLOPS
Board Design
Unknown
TDP
300W
200 W
Suggested PSU
700 W
1x VGA
Outputs
No outputs
-
Power Connectors
1x 8-pin
Graphics Processor
Rage IIC
GPU Name
DG1
Rage IIC PCI
(215R2PZUA21)
GPU Variant
-
Rage 2
Architecture
Generation 12.1
UMC
Foundry
Intel
500 nm
Process Size
10 nm
0.005 billion
Transistors
Unknown
39 mm²
Die Size
95 mm²
Graphics Features
5.0
DirectX
12 (12_1)
N/A
OpenGL
4.6
N/A
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
-
-
-
-
Shader Model
6.4
