Xeon X5355 vs AMD EPYC Embedded 9124
We compared two server CPUs: Xeon X5355 with 4 cores 2.667GHz and AMD EPYC Embedded 9124 with 16 cores 3GHz . You will find out which processor performs better in benchmark tests, key specifications, power consumption and more.
Main Differences
Xeon X5355 's Advantages
Lower TDP (120W vs 200W)
AMD EPYC Embedded 9124 's Advantages
Released 16 years and 4 months late
Higher specification of memory (4800 vs 3)
Higher base frequency (3GHz vs 2.667GHz)
More modern manufacturing process (5nm vs 65nm)
Score
Benchmark
Geekbench 6 Single Core
Xeon X5355
301
AMD EPYC Embedded 9124
+554%
1970
Geekbench 6 Multi Core
Xeon X5355
1355
AMD EPYC Embedded 9124
+1130%
16674
General Parameters
Nov 2006
Release Date
Mar 2023
Intel
Manufacturer
AMD
Server
Type
Server
Clovertown
Core Architecture
Genoa
Intel Socket 771
Socket
AMD Socket SP5
N/A
Integrated Graphics
N/A
Xeon (Clovertown)
Generation
EPYC (Zen 4 (Genoa))
Package
0.582 billions
Transistor Count
26.28 billions
65 nm
Manufacturing Process
5 nm
120 W
Power Consumption
200 W
63 °C
Peak Operating Temperature
-
-
Foundry
TSMC
2x143 mm²
Die Size
4x72 mm²
-
I/O Process Size
6 nm
-
I/O Die Size
397 mm²
CPU Performance
2.667 GHz
Performance Core Base Frequency
3 GHz
0
Performance Core Turbo Frequency
3.7 GHz
4
Total Core Count
16
4
Total Thread Count
32
333 MHz
Bus Frequency
100 MHz
8.0
Multiplier
30.0
64 KB per core
L1 Cache
64 K per core
4 MB per die
L2 Cache
1 MB per core
-
L3 Cache
64 MB shared
No
Unlocked Multiplier
No
2
SMP
2
Memory Parameters
DDR2, DDR3
Memory Types
DDR5-4800
2
Max Memory Channels
12
Yes
ECC Memory Support
Yes
Miscellaneous
0
PCIe Version
5
-
PCIe Lanes
128
