UHD Graphics 610 vs Arc 140T Mobile
We compared two Integrated graphics card GPUs: 0System Shared VRAM UHD Graphics 610 and 0System Shared VRAM Arc 140T Mobile to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
UHD Graphics 610 's Advantages
Lower TDP (15W vs 35W)
Arc 140T Mobile 's Advantages
Released 4 years and 9 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 124% (2350MHz vs 1050MHz)
928 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
UHD Graphics 610
202
Arc 140T Mobile
+2282%
4813
3DMark Time Spy
UHD Graphics 610
222
Arc 140T Mobile
+1707%
4012
3DMark Time Spy Extreme
UHD Graphics 610
102
Arc 140T Mobile
+1847%
1986
Graphics Card
Apr 2020
Release Date
Jan 2025
HD Graphics
Generation
Arc Graphics-M
Integrated
Type
Integrated
Ring Bus
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x8
Clock Speeds
350 MHz
Base Clock
300 MHz
1050 MHz
Boost Clock
2350 MHz
System Shared
Memory Clock
System Shared
Memory
System Shared
Memory Size
System Shared
System Shared
Memory Type
System Shared
System Shared
Memory Bus
System Shared
System Dependent
Bandwidth
System Dependent
Render Config
96
Shading Units
1024
12
TMUs
64
2
ROPs
32
-
Tensor Cores
128
-
RT Cores
8
-
L2 Cache
4 MB
Theoretical Performance
2.100 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
75.20 GPixel/s
12.60 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
150.4 GTexel/s
403.2 GFLOPS
FP16 (half)
9.626 TFLOPS
201.6 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
4.813 TFLOPS
50.40 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
1203 GFLOPS
Board Design
15W
TDP
35W
No outputs
Outputs
Portable Device Dependent
Graphics Processor
Comet Lake GT1
GPU Name
Arrow Lake
Generation 9.5
Architecture
Xe2-LPG
Intel
Foundry
TSMC
14 nm+++
Process Size
3 nm
Unknown
Transistors
Unknown
Unknown
Die Size
Unknown
Graphics Features
12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
6.4
Shader Model
6.8
