UHD Graphics 605 vs Arc 140T Mobile
We compared two Integrated graphics card GPUs: 0System Shared VRAM UHD Graphics 605 and 0System Shared VRAM Arc 140T Mobile to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
UHD Graphics 605 's Advantages
Lower TDP (5W vs 35W)
Arc 140T Mobile 's Advantages
Released 7 years and 1 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 213% (2350MHz vs 750MHz)
880 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
UHD Graphics 605
216
Arc 140T Mobile
+2128%
4813
3DMark Time Spy
UHD Graphics 605
137
Arc 140T Mobile
+2828%
4012
Graphics Card
Dec 2017
Release Date
Jan 2025
HD Graphics-T
Generation
Arc Graphics-M
Integrated
Type
Integrated
Ring Bus
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x8
Clock Speeds
200 MHz
Base Clock
300 MHz
750 MHz
Boost Clock
2350 MHz
System Shared
Memory Clock
System Shared
Memory
System Shared
Memory Size
System Shared
System Shared
Memory Type
System Shared
System Shared
Memory Bus
System Shared
System Dependent
Bandwidth
System Dependent
Render Config
144
Shading Units
1024
18
TMUs
64
3
ROPs
32
-
Tensor Cores
128
-
RT Cores
8
-
L2 Cache
4 MB
Theoretical Performance
2.250 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
75.20 GPixel/s
13.50 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
150.4 GTexel/s
432.0 GFLOPS
FP16 (half)
9.626 TFLOPS
216.0 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
4.813 TFLOPS
54.00 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
1203 GFLOPS
Board Design
5W
TDP
35W
No outputs
Outputs
Portable Device Dependent
Graphics Processor
Gemini Lake GT1.5
GPU Name
Arrow Lake
Generation 9.5
Architecture
Xe2-LPG
Intel
Foundry
TSMC
14 nm
Process Size
3 nm
Unknown
Transistors
Unknown
Unknown
Die Size
Unknown
Graphics Features
12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
6.4
Shader Model
6.8
