Tesla C2075 vs RTX A5000
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 6GB VRAM Tesla C2075 and 24GB VRAM RTX A5000 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
RTX A5000 's Advantages
Released 9 years and 9 months late
Boost Clock1695MHz
More VRAM (24GB vs 6GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (768.0GB/s vs 150.3GB/s)
7744 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (230W vs 247W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Tesla C2075
1028
RTX A5000
+2601%
27770
Graphics Card
Jul 2011
Release Date
Apr 2021
Tesla
Generation
Quadro Ampere
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
1170 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1695 MHz
783 MHz
Memory Clock
2000 MHz
Memory
6GB
Memory Size
24GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
384bit
Memory Bus
384bit
150.3GB/s
Bandwidth
768.0GB/s
Render Config
14
SM Count
64
448
Shading Units
8192
56
TMUs
256
48
ROPs
96
-
Tensor Cores
256
-
RT Cores
64
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
768 KB
L2 Cache
6 MB
Theoretical Performance
16.07 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
162.7 GPixel/s
32.14 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
433.9 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
27.77 TFLOPS
1028 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
27.77 TFLOPS
513.9 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
433.9 GFLOPS
Board Design
247W
TDP
230W
550 W
Suggested PSU
550 W
1x DVI
Outputs
4x DisplayPort 1.4a
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
1x 8-pin
Graphics Processor
GF110
GPU Name
GA102
GF110-351-A1
GPU Variant
-
Fermi 2.0
Architecture
Ampere
TSMC
Foundry
Samsung
40 nm
Process Size
8 nm
3 billion
Transistors
28.3 billion
520 mm²
Die Size
628 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
2.0
CUDA
8.6
5.1
Shader Model
6.7
