Tesla C2075 vs Quadro P5200 Max Q
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 6GB VRAM Tesla C2075 and 16GB VRAM Quadro P5200 Max Q to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Quadro P5200 Max Q 's Advantages
Released 6 years and 7 months late
Boost Clock1569MHz
More VRAM (16GB vs 6GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (230.9GB/s vs 150.3GB/s)
2112 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (100W vs 247W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Tesla C2075
1028
Quadro P5200 Max Q
+681%
8033
Graphics Card
Jul 2011
Release Date
Feb 2018
Tesla
Generation
Quadro Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
MXM-B (3.0)
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
1316 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1569 MHz
783 MHz
Memory Clock
1804 MHz
Memory
6GB
Memory Size
16GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
384bit
Memory Bus
256bit
150.3GB/s
Bandwidth
230.9GB/s
Render Config
14
SM Count
20
448
Shading Units
2560
56
TMUs
160
48
ROPs
64
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
48 KB (per SM)
768 KB
L2 Cache
2 MB
Theoretical Performance
16.07 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
100.4 GPixel/s
32.14 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
251.0 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
125.5 GFLOPS
1028 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
8.033 TFLOPS
513.9 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
251.0 GFLOPS
Board Design
247W
TDP
100W
550 W
Suggested PSU
-
1x DVI
Outputs
No outputs
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
GF110
GPU Name
GP104
GF110-351-A1
GPU Variant
-
Fermi 2.0
Architecture
Pascal
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
16 nm
3 billion
Transistors
7.2 billion
520 mm²
Die Size
314 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
2.0
CUDA
6.1
5.1
Shader Model
6.4
