Tesla C2075 vs AMD Instinct MI300A
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 6GB VRAM Tesla C2075 and 128GB VRAM AMD Instinct MI300A to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Tesla C2075 's Advantages
Lower TDP (247W vs 760W)
AMD Instinct MI300A 's Advantages
Released 12 years and 5 months late
Boost Clock2100MHz
More VRAM (128GB vs 6GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (5300GB/s vs 150.3GB/s)
14144 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Tesla C2075
1028
AMD Instinct MI300A
+11826%
122600
Graphics Card
Jul 2011
Release Date
Dec 2023
Tesla
Generation
Instinct
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 5.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
1000 MHz
-
Boost Clock
2100 MHz
783 MHz
Memory Clock
5200 MHz
Memory
6GB
Memory Size
128GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
HBM3
384bit
Memory Bus
8192bit
150.3GB/s
Bandwidth
5300GB/s
Render Config
-
Compute Units
228
14
SM Count
-
448
Shading Units
14592
56
TMUs
880
48
ROPs
0
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
768 KB
L2 Cache
16 MB
Theoretical Performance
16.07 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
0 MPixel/s
32.14 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
1496 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
980.6 TFLOPS
1028 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
122.6 TFLOPS
513.9 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
61.3 TFLOPS
Board Design
247W
TDP
760W
550 W
Suggested PSU
1000 W
1x DVI
Outputs
No outputs
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
GF110
GPU Name
MI300
GF110-351-A1
GPU Variant
-
Fermi 2.0
Architecture
CDNA 3.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
5 nm
3 billion
Transistors
146 billion
520 mm²
Die Size
1017 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (11_0)
DirectX
N/A
4.6
OpenGL
N/A
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
2.0
CUDA
-
5.1
Shader Model
N/A
