Tesla C2075 vs Radeon Instinct MI25
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 6GB VRAM Tesla C2075 and 16GB VRAM Radeon Instinct MI25 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Tesla C2075 's Advantages
Lower TDP (247W vs 300W)
Radeon Instinct MI25 's Advantages
Released 5 years and 11 months late
Boost Clock1500MHz
More VRAM (16GB vs 6GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (436.2GB/s vs 150.3GB/s)
3648 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Tesla C2075
1028
Radeon Instinct MI25
+1095%
12290
Graphics Card
Jul 2011
Release Date
Jun 2017
Tesla
Generation
Radeon Instinct
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
1400 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1500 MHz
783 MHz
Memory Clock
852 MHz
Memory
6GB
Memory Size
16GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
HBM2
384bit
Memory Bus
2048bit
150.3GB/s
Bandwidth
436.2GB/s
Render Config
-
Compute Units
64
14
SM Count
-
448
Shading Units
4096
56
TMUs
256
48
ROPs
64
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
768 KB
L2 Cache
4 MB
Theoretical Performance
16.07 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
96.00 GPixel/s
32.14 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
384.0 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
24.58 TFLOPS
1028 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
12.29 TFLOPS
513.9 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
768.0 GFLOPS
Board Design
247W
TDP
300W
550 W
Suggested PSU
700 W
1x DVI
Outputs
No outputs
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
2x 8-pin
Graphics Processor
GF110
GPU Name
Vega 10
GF110-351-A1
GPU Variant
Vega 10 XT GL
(215-0894124)
Fermi 2.0
Architecture
GCN 5.0
TSMC
Foundry
GlobalFoundries
40 nm
Process Size
14 nm
3 billion
Transistors
12.5 billion
520 mm²
Die Size
495 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
2.1
N/A
Vulkan
1.2
2.0
CUDA
-
5.1
Shader Model
6.4
