T600 Mobile vs FirePro M8900
We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM T600 Mobile and 2GB VRAM FirePro M8900 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
T600 Mobile 's Advantages
Released 10 years late
Boost Clock1410MHz
More VRAM (4GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (192.0GB/s vs 115.2GB/s)
Lower TDP (40W vs 75W)
FirePro M8900 's Advantages
64 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
T600 Mobile
+93%
2527
FirePro M8900
1306
Graphics Card
Apr 2021
Release Date
Apr 2011
Quadro Turing-M
Generation
FirePro Mobile
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
MXM-B (3.0)
Clock Speeds
780 MHz
Base Clock
-
1410 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1500 MHz
Memory Clock
900 MHz
Memory
4GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
256bit
192.0GB/s
Bandwidth
115.2GB/s
Render Config
-
Compute Units
12
14
SM Count
-
896
Shading Units
960
56
TMUs
48
32
ROPs
32
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
8 KB (per CU)
1024 KB
L2 Cache
512 KB
Theoretical Performance
45.12 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
21.76 GPixel/s
78.96 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
32.64 GTexel/s
5.053 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
2.527 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1306 GFLOPS
78.96 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-
Board Design
40W
TDP
75W
Portable Device Dependent
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
TU117
GPU Name
Blackcomb
-
GPU Variant
Blackcomb XT GL
Turing
Architecture
TeraScale 2
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
12 nm
Process Size
40 nm
4.7 billion
Transistors
1.7 billion
200 mm²
Die Size
212 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (12_1)
DirectX
11.2 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.4
3.0
OpenCL
1.2
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
7.5
CUDA
-
6.7
Shader Model
5.0
