RTX A4000 vs Tesla C2075
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 16GB VRAM RTX A4000 and 6GB VRAM Tesla C2075 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
RTX A4000 's Advantages
Released 9 years and 9 months late
Boost Clock1560MHz
More VRAM (16GB vs 6GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (448.0GB/s vs 150.3GB/s)
5696 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (140W vs 247W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
RTX A4000
+1764%
19170
Tesla C2075
1028
Graphics Card
Apr 2021
Release Date
Jul 2011
Quadro Ampere
Generation
Tesla
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
735 MHz
Base Clock
-
1560 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1750 MHz
Memory Clock
783 MHz
Memory
16GB
Memory Size
6GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
384bit
448.0GB/s
Bandwidth
150.3GB/s
Render Config
48
SM Count
14
6144
Shading Units
448
192
TMUs
56
96
ROPs
48
192
Tensor Cores
-
48
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
4 MB
L2 Cache
768 KB
Theoretical Performance
149.8 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
16.07 GPixel/s
299.5 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
32.14 GTexel/s
19.17 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
19.17 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1028 GFLOPS
299.5 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
513.9 GFLOPS
Board Design
140W
TDP
247W
300 W
Suggested PSU
550 W
4x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
1x DVI
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Graphics Processor
GA104
GPU Name
GF110
GA104-875-A1
GPU Variant
GF110-351-A1
Ampere
Architecture
Fermi 2.0
Samsung
Foundry
TSMC
8 nm
Process Size
40 nm
17.4 billion
Transistors
3 billion
392 mm²
Die Size
520 mm²
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
8.6
CUDA
2.0
6.7
Shader Model
5.1
