Home Comparison RTX A4000 vs Quadro K1000M

RTX A4000 vs Quadro K1000M

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 16GB VRAM RTX A4000 and 2GB VRAM Quadro K1000M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

RTX A4000 's Advantages
Released 8 years and 10 months late
Boost Clock1560MHz
More VRAM (16GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (448.0GB/s vs 28.80GB/s)
5952 additional rendering cores
Quadro K1000M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (45W vs 140W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
RTX A4000 +5780%
19170
Quadro K1000M
326
Blender
RTX A4000 +15090%
3190
Quadro K1000M
21

Graphics Card

Apr 2021
Release Date
Jun 2012
Quadro Ampere
Generation
Quadro Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
MXM-A (3.0)

Clock Speeds

735 MHz
Base Clock
-
1560 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1750 MHz
Memory Clock
900 MHz

Memory

16GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
DDR3
256bit
Memory Bus
128bit
448.0GB/s
Bandwidth
28.80GB/s

Render Config

48
SM Count
-
6144
Shading Units
192
192
TMUs
16
96
ROPs
16
192
Tensor Cores
-
48
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per SMX)
4 MB
L2 Cache
256 KB

Theoretical Performance

149.8 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
3.400 GPixel/s
299.5 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
13.60 GTexel/s
19.17 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
19.17 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
326.4 GFLOPS
299.5 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
13.60 GFLOPS

Board Design

140W
TDP
45W
300 W
Suggested PSU
-
4x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
No outputs
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
-

Graphics Processor

GA104
GPU Name
GK107
GA104-875-A1
GPU Variant
N14P-Q1-A2
Ampere
Architecture
Kepler
Samsung
Foundry
TSMC
8 nm
Process Size
28 nm
17.4 billion
Transistors
1.27 billion
392 mm²
Die Size
118 mm²

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.1
8.6
CUDA
3.0
6.7
Shader Model
5.1
© 2025 - TopCPU.net