Home Comparison RTX A4000 vs Quadro RTX 6000 Passive

RTX A4000 vs Quadro RTX 6000 Passive

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 16GB VRAM RTX A4000 and 24GB VRAM Quadro RTX 6000 Passive to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

RTX A4000 's Advantages
Released 2 years and 8 months late
1536 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (140W vs 260W)
Quadro RTX 6000 Passive 's Advantages
More VRAM (24GB vs 16GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (672.0GB/s vs 448.0GB/s)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
RTX A4000 +33%
19170
Quadro RTX 6000 Passive
14380

Graphics Card

Apr 2021
Release Date
Aug 2018
Quadro Ampere
Generation
Quadro
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

735 MHz
Base Clock
1305 MHz
1560 MHz
Boost Clock
1560 MHz
1750 MHz
Memory Clock
1750 MHz

Memory

16GB
Memory Size
24GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR6
256bit
Memory Bus
384bit
448.0GB/s
Bandwidth
672.0GB/s

Render Config

48
SM Count
72
6144
Shading Units
4608
192
TMUs
288
96
ROPs
96
192
Tensor Cores
576
48
RT Cores
72
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
4 MB
L2 Cache
6 MB

Theoretical Performance

149.8 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
149.8 GPixel/s
299.5 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
449.3 GTexel/s
19.17 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
28.75 TFLOPS
19.17 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
14.38 TFLOPS
299.5 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
449.3 GFLOPS

Board Design

140W
TDP
260W
300 W
Suggested PSU
600 W
4x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
No outputs
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

GA104
GPU Name
TU102
GA104-875-A1
GPU Variant
TU102-875-A1
Ampere
Architecture
Turing
Samsung
Foundry
TSMC
8 nm
Process Size
12 nm
17.4 billion
Transistors
18.6 billion
392 mm²
Die Size
754 mm²

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
8.6
CUDA
7.5
6.7
Shader Model
6.6
© 2025 - TopCPU.net