RTX A4000 vs Quadro FX 3600M
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 16GB VRAM RTX A4000 and 512MB VRAM Quadro FX 3600M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
RTX A4000 's Advantages
Released 13 years and 2 months late
Boost Clock1560MHz
More VRAM (16GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (448.0GB/s vs 51.14GB/s)
6080 additional rendering cores
Quadro FX 3600M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (70W vs 140W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
RTX A4000
+11881%
19170
Quadro FX 3600M
160
Graphics Card
Apr 2021
Release Date
Feb 2008
Quadro Ampere
Generation
Quadro FX Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
MXM-HE
Clock Speeds
735 MHz
Base Clock
-
1560 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1750 MHz
Memory Clock
799 MHz
Memory
16GB
Memory Size
512MB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR3
256bit
Memory Bus
256bit
448.0GB/s
Bandwidth
51.14GB/s
Render Config
48
SM Count
8
6144
Shading Units
64
192
TMUs
32
96
ROPs
16
192
Tensor Cores
-
48
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
4 MB
L2 Cache
64 KB
Theoretical Performance
149.8 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
8.000 GPixel/s
299.5 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
16.00 GTexel/s
19.17 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
19.17 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
160.0 GFLOPS
299.5 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-
Board Design
140W
TDP
70W
300 W
Suggested PSU
-
4x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
No outputs
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
-
Graphics Processor
GA104
GPU Name
G92
GA104-875-A1
GPU Variant
NB8E-GLM3
Ampere
Architecture
Tesla
Samsung
Foundry
TSMC
8 nm
Process Size
65 nm
17.4 billion
Transistors
0.754 billion
392 mm²
Die Size
324 mm²
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
8.6
CUDA
1.1
6.7
Shader Model
4.0
