Home Comparison RTX A4000 vs AMD Instinct MI300X

RTX A4000 vs AMD Instinct MI300X

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 16GB VRAM RTX A4000 and 192GB VRAM AMD Instinct MI300X to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

RTX A4000 's Advantages
Lower TDP (140W vs 750W)
AMD Instinct MI300X 's Advantages
Released 2 years and 8 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 35% (2100MHz vs 1560MHz)
More VRAM (192GB vs 16GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (5300GB/s vs 448.0GB/s)
13312 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
RTX A4000
19170
AMD Instinct MI300X +752%
163400

Graphics Card

Apr 2021
Release Date
Dec 2023
Quadro Ampere
Generation
Instinct
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 5.0 x16

Clock Speeds

735 MHz
Base Clock
1000 MHz
1560 MHz
Boost Clock
2100 MHz
1750 MHz
Memory Clock
5200 MHz

Memory

16GB
Memory Size
192GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
HBM3
256bit
Memory Bus
8192bit
448.0GB/s
Bandwidth
5300GB/s

Render Config

-
Compute Units
304
48
SM Count
-
6144
Shading Units
19456
192
TMUs
880
96
ROPs
0
192
Tensor Cores
-
48
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
4 MB
L2 Cache
16 MB

Theoretical Performance

149.8 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
0 MPixel/s
299.5 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
1496 GTexel/s
19.17 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
1300 TFLOPS
19.17 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
163.4 TFLOPS
299.5 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
81.7 TFLOPS

Board Design

140W
TDP
750W
300 W
Suggested PSU
1000 W
4x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
No outputs
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

GA104
GPU Name
MI300
GA104-875-A1
GPU Variant
-
Ampere
Architecture
CDNA 3.0
Samsung
Foundry
TSMC
8 nm
Process Size
5 nm
17.4 billion
Transistors
146 billion
392 mm²
Die Size
1017 mm²

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
N/A
4.6
OpenGL
N/A
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
8.6
CUDA
-
6.7
Shader Model
N/A
© 2025 - TopCPU.net