RTX 6000 Ada vs T1000
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 48GB VRAM RTX 6000 Ada and 4GB VRAM T1000 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
RTX 6000 Ada 's Advantages
Released 1 years and 7 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 80% (2505MHz vs 1395MHz)
More VRAM (48GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (960.0GB/s vs 160.0GB/s)
17280 additional rendering cores
T1000 's Advantages
Lower TDP (50W vs 300W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
RTX 6000 Ada
+3542%
91060
T1000
2500
3DMark Time Spy
RTX 6000 Ada
+753%
26240
T1000
3073
3DMark Time Spy Extreme
RTX 6000 Ada
+798%
12629
T1000
1406
Graphics Card
Dec 2022
Release Date
May 2021
Quadro Ada
Generation
Quadro Turing
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
915 MHz
Base Clock
1065 MHz
2505 MHz
Boost Clock
1395 MHz
2500 MHz
Memory Clock
1250 MHz
Memory
48GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR6
384bit
Memory Bus
128bit
960.0GB/s
Bandwidth
160.0GB/s
Render Config
142
SM Count
14
18176
Shading Units
896
568
TMUs
56
192
ROPs
32
568
Tensor Cores
-
142
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
96 MB
L2 Cache
1024 KB
Theoretical Performance
481.0 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
44.64 GPixel/s
1423 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
78.12 GTexel/s
91.06 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
5.000 TFLOPS
91.06 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.500 TFLOPS
1423 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
78.12 GFLOPS
Board Design
300W
TDP
50W
700 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
4x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
1x 16-pin
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
AD102
GPU Name
TU117
AD102
GPU Variant
-
Ada Lovelace
Architecture
Turing
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
5 nm
Process Size
12 nm
76.3 billion
Transistors
4.7 billion
609 mm²
Die Size
200 mm²
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
8.9
CUDA
7.5
6.8
Shader Model
6.8
