RTX 6000 Ada vs NVS 315
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 48GB VRAM RTX 6000 Ada and 1024MB VRAM NVS 315 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
RTX 6000 Ada 's Advantages
Released 9 years and 9 months late
Boost Clock2505MHz
More VRAM (48GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (960.0GB/s vs 14.00GB/s)
18128 additional rendering cores
NVS 315 's Advantages
Lower TDP (19W vs 300W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
RTX 6000 Ada
+90960%
91060
NVS 315
100
Graphics Card
Dec 2022
Release Date
Mar 2013
Quadro Ada
Generation
NVS
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
915 MHz
Base Clock
-
2505 MHz
Boost Clock
-
2500 MHz
Memory Clock
875 MHz
Memory
48GB
Memory Size
1024MB
GDDR6
Memory Type
DDR3
384bit
Memory Bus
64bit
960.0GB/s
Bandwidth
14.00GB/s
Render Config
142
SM Count
1
18176
Shading Units
48
568
TMUs
8
192
ROPs
4
568
Tensor Cores
-
142
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
96 MB
L2 Cache
128 KB
Theoretical Performance
481.0 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
1.046 GPixel/s
1423 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
4.184 GTexel/s
91.06 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
91.06 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
100.4 GFLOPS
1423 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
8.368 GFLOPS
Board Design
300W
TDP
19W
700 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
4x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
1x DMS-59
1x 16-pin
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
AD102
GPU Name
GF119
AD102
GPU Variant
GF119-825-A1
Ada Lovelace
Architecture
Fermi 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
5 nm
Process Size
40 nm
76.3 billion
Transistors
0.292 billion
609 mm²
Die Size
79 mm²
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
8.9
CUDA
2.1
6.8
Shader Model
5.1
