RTX 6000 Ada vs Arc A770
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 48GB VRAM RTX 6000 Ada and 16GB VRAM Arc A770 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
RTX 6000 Ada 's Advantages
Boost Clock has increased by 4% (2505MHz vs 2400MHz)
More VRAM (48GB vs 16GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (960.0GB/s vs 512.0GB/s)
14080 additional rendering cores
Arc A770 's Advantages
Lower TDP (225W vs 300W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
RTX 6000 Ada
+363%
91060
Arc A770
19660
3DMark Time Spy
RTX 6000 Ada
+93%
26240
Arc A770
13560
3DMark Time Spy Extreme
RTX 6000 Ada
+93%
12629
Arc A770
6525
3DMark Speed Way
RTX 6000 Ada
+228%
8028
Arc A770
2442
Graphics Card
Dec 2022
Release Date
Oct 2022
Quadro Ada
Generation
Alchemist(Arc 7)
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16
Clock Speeds
915 MHz
Base Clock
2100 MHz
2505 MHz
Boost Clock
2400 MHz
2500 MHz
Memory Clock
2000 MHz
Memory
48GB
Memory Size
16GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR6
384bit
Memory Bus
256bit
960.0GB/s
Bandwidth
512.0GB/s
Render Config
142
SM Count
-
18176
Shading Units
4096
568
TMUs
256
192
ROPs
128
568
Tensor Cores
512
142
RT Cores
32
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
96 MB
L2 Cache
16 MB
Theoretical Performance
481.0 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
307.2 GPixel/s
1423 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
614.4 GTexel/s
91.06 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
39.32 TFLOPS
91.06 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
19.66 TFLOPS
1423 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
2.458 TFLOPS
Board Design
300W
TDP
225W
700 W
Suggested PSU
550 W
4x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
1x HDMI 2.13x DisplayPort 2.0
1x 16-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Graphics Processor
AD102
GPU Name
DG2-512
AD102
GPU Variant
ACM-G10
Ada Lovelace
Architecture
Generation 12.7
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
5 nm
Process Size
6 nm
76.3 billion
Transistors
21.7 billion
609 mm²
Die Size
406 mm²
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
8.9
CUDA
-
6.8
Shader Model
6.6
