RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation vs Quadro NVS 130M
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 16GB VRAM RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation and 256MB VRAM Quadro NVS 130M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation 's Advantages
Released 11 years and 6 months late
Boost Clock1746MHz
More VRAM (16GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (1.02TB/s vs 11.20GB/s)
3832 additional rendering cores
Quadro NVS 130M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (10W vs 300W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation
+103053%
13410
Quadro NVS 130M
13
Graphics Card
Nov 2018
Release Date
May 2007
Radeon Instinct
Generation
NVS Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1200 MHz
Base Clock
-
1746 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1000 MHz
Memory Clock
700 MHz
Memory
16GB
Memory Size
256MB
HBM2
Memory Type
DDR2
4096bit
Memory Bus
64bit
1.02TB/s
Bandwidth
11.20GB/s
Render Config
60
Compute Units
-
48
SM Count
1
3840
Shading Units
8
240
TMUs
8
64
ROPs
4
192
Tensor Cores
-
48
RT Cores
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
-
4 MB
L2 Cache
16 KB
Theoretical Performance
111.7 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
1.600 GPixel/s
419.0 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
3.200 GTexel/s
26.82 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
13.41 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
12.80 GFLOPS
6.705 TFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-
Board Design
300W
TDP
10W
700 W
Suggested PSU
-
1x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
No outputs
2x 8-pin
Power Connectors
-
Graphics Processor
Vega 20
GPU Name
G86
Vega 20 GLXT
GPU Variant
G86-613-A2
GCN 5.1
Architecture
Tesla
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
7 nm
Process Size
80 nm
13.23 billion
Transistors
0.21 billion
331 mm²
Die Size
127 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (12_1)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
2.1
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
8.9
CUDA
1.1
6.7
Shader Model
4.0
