Radeon R9 M395X Mac Edition vs RTX A2000 Max Q 8 GB
We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM Radeon R9 M395X Mac Edition and 8GB VRAM RTX A2000 Max Q 8 GB to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
RTX A2000 Max Q 8 GB 's Advantages
Released 5 years and 11 months late
Boost Clock1177MHz
More VRAM (8GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (176.0GB/s vs 174.7GB/s)
512 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (95W vs 250W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Radeon R9 M395X Mac Edition
3723
RTX A2000 Max Q 8 GB
+61%
6026
Graphics Card
May 2015
Release Date
Apr 2021
Crystal System
Generation
Ampere-MW
Mobile
Type
Mobile
MXM-B (3.0)
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
607 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1177 MHz
1365 MHz
Memory Clock
1375 MHz
Memory
4GB
Memory Size
8GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
256bit
Memory Bus
128bit
174.7GB/s
Bandwidth
176.0GB/s
Render Config
32
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
20
2048
Shading Units
2560
128
TMUs
80
32
ROPs
48
-
Tensor Cores
80
-
RT Cores
20
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
512 KB
L2 Cache
2 MB
Theoretical Performance
29.09 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
56.50 GPixel/s
116.4 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
94.16 GTexel/s
3.723 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
6.026 TFLOPS
3.723 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
6.026 TFLOPS
232.7 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
94.16 GFLOPS
Board Design
250W
TDP
95W
No outputs
Outputs
Portable Device Dependent
None
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
Amethyst
GPU Name
GA107
Amethyst XT
GPU Variant
-
GCN 3.0
Architecture
Ampere
TSMC
Foundry
Samsung
28 nm
Process Size
8 nm
5 billion
Transistors
8.7 billion
366 mm²
Die Size
200 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (12_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
2.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.2
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
8.6
6.3
Shader Model
6.8