Radeon R9 M395X Mac Edition vs GeForce GTX 765M
We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM Radeon R9 M395X Mac Edition and 2GB VRAM GeForce GTX 765M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Radeon R9 M395X Mac Edition 's Advantages
Released 2 years late
More VRAM (4GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (174.7GB/s vs 64.13GB/s)
1280 additional rendering cores
GeForce GTX 765M 's Advantages
Boost Clock863MHz
Lower TDP (75W vs 250W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Radeon R9 M395X Mac Edition
+180%
3723
GeForce GTX 765M
1326
Graphics Card
May 2015
Release Date
May 2013
Crystal System
Generation
GeForce 700M
Mobile
Type
Mobile
MXM-B (3.0)
Bus Interface
MXM-B (3.0)
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
797 MHz
-
Boost Clock
863 MHz
1365 MHz
Memory Clock
1002 MHz
Memory
4GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
128bit
174.7GB/s
Bandwidth
64.13GB/s
Render Config
32
Compute Units
-
2048
Shading Units
768
128
TMUs
64
32
ROPs
16
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per SMX)
512 KB
L2 Cache
256 KB
Theoretical Performance
29.09 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
13.81 GPixel/s
116.4 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
55.23 GTexel/s
3.723 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
3.723 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1326 GFLOPS
232.7 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
55.23 GFLOPS
Board Design
250W
TDP
75W
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
-
Graphics Processor
Amethyst
GPU Name
GK106
Amethyst XT
GPU Variant
N14E-GE-B-A1
GCN 3.0
Architecture
Kepler
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
28 nm
5 billion
Transistors
2.54 billion
366 mm²
Die Size
221 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (12_0)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
2.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.2
Vulkan
1.1
-
CUDA
3.0
6.3
Shader Model
5.1