Radeon R9 M395X Mac Edition vs FirePro M7740
We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM Radeon R9 M395X Mac Edition and 1024MB VRAM FirePro M7740 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Radeon R9 M395X Mac Edition 's Advantages
Released 5 years and 9 months late
More VRAM (4GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (174.7GB/s vs 54.14GB/s)
1408 additional rendering cores
FirePro M7740 's Advantages
Lower TDP (60W vs 250W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Radeon R9 M395X Mac Edition
+347%
3723
FirePro M7740
832
Graphics Card
May 2015
Release Date
Aug 2009
Crystal System
Generation
FirePro Mobility
Mobile
Type
Mobile
MXM-B (3.0)
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1365 MHz
Memory Clock
846 MHz
Memory
4GB
Memory Size
1024MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
128bit
174.7GB/s
Bandwidth
54.14GB/s
Render Config
32
Compute Units
8
2048
Shading Units
640
128
TMUs
32
32
ROPs
16
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
512 KB
L2 Cache
128 KB
Theoretical Performance
29.09 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
10.40 GPixel/s
116.4 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
20.80 GTexel/s
3.723 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
3.723 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
832.0 GFLOPS
232.7 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
166.4 GFLOPS
Board Design
250W
TDP
60W
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
Amethyst
GPU Name
M97
Amethyst XT
GPU Variant
M97XT-GL
GCN 3.0
Architecture
TeraScale
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
40 nm
5 billion
Transistors
0.826 billion
366 mm²
Die Size
137 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (12_0)
DirectX
10.1 (10_1)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
2.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.2
Vulkan
N/A
6.3
Shader Model
4.1
