Radeon R9 M395X Mac Edition vs GeForce GTX 760M
We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM Radeon R9 M395X Mac Edition and 2GB VRAM GeForce GTX 760M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Radeon R9 M395X Mac Edition 's Advantages
Released 2 years late
More VRAM (4GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (174.7GB/s vs 64.13GB/s)
1280 additional rendering cores
GeForce GTX 760M 's Advantages
Boost Clock657MHz
Lower TDP (55W vs 250W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Radeon R9 M395X Mac Edition
+268%
3723
GeForce GTX 760M
1009
Graphics Card
May 2015
Release Date
May 2013
Crystal System
Generation
GeForce 700M
Mobile
Type
Mobile
MXM-B (3.0)
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
628 MHz
-
Boost Clock
657 MHz
1365 MHz
Memory Clock
1002 MHz
Memory
4GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
128bit
174.7GB/s
Bandwidth
64.13GB/s
Render Config
32
Compute Units
-
2048
Shading Units
768
128
TMUs
64
32
ROPs
16
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per SMX)
512 KB
L2 Cache
256 KB
Theoretical Performance
29.09 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
10.51 GPixel/s
116.4 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
42.05 GTexel/s
3.723 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
3.723 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1009 GFLOPS
232.7 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
42.05 GFLOPS
Board Design
250W
TDP
55W
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
-
Graphics Processor
Amethyst
GPU Name
GK106
Amethyst XT
GPU Variant
N14E-GL-A1
GCN 3.0
Architecture
Kepler
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
28 nm
5 billion
Transistors
2.54 billion
366 mm²
Die Size
221 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (12_0)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
2.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.2
Vulkan
1.1
-
CUDA
3.0
6.3
Shader Model
5.1