Home Comparison Radeon R9 M380 Mac Edition vs RTX 5000 Embedded Ada Generation

Radeon R9 M380 Mac Edition vs RTX 5000 Embedded Ada Generation

We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM Radeon R9 M380 Mac Edition and 16GB VRAM RTX 5000 Embedded Ada Generation to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

RTX 5000 Embedded Ada Generation 's Advantages
Released 7 years and 10 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 65% (1680MHz vs 1021MHz)
More VRAM (16GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (576.0GB/s vs 100.4GB/s)
8960 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon R9 M380 Mac Edition
1568
RTX 5000 Embedded Ada Generation +1984%
32690

Graphics Card

May 2015
Release Date
Mar 2023
Gem System
Generation
Quadro Ada-M
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16

Clock Speeds

900 MHz
Base Clock
930 MHz
1021 MHz
Boost Clock
1680 MHz
1568 MHz
Memory Clock
2250 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
16GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
128bit
Memory Bus
256bit
100.4GB/s
Bandwidth
576.0GB/s

Render Config

12
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
76
768
Shading Units
9728
48
TMUs
304
16
ROPs
112
-
Tensor Cores
304
-
RT Cores
76
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
256 KB
L2 Cache
64 MB

Theoretical Performance

16.34 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
188.2 GPixel/s
49.01 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
510.7 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
32.69 TFLOPS
1.568 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
32.69 TFLOPS
98.02 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
510.7 GFLOPS

Board Design

Unknown
TDP
120W
Portable Device Dependent
Outputs
Portable Device Dependent
-
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

Strato
GPU Name
AD103
Strato PRO
GPU Variant
-
GCN 2.0
Architecture
Ada Lovelace
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
5 nm
2.08 billion
Transistors
45.9 billion
160 mm²
Die Size
379 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
2.1
OpenCL
3.0
1.2.170
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
8.9
6.5
Shader Model
6.8
© 2025 - TopCPU.net