Radeon R9 295X2 vs GeForce GTX 1660 Ti
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM Radeon R9 295X2 and 6GB VRAM GeForce GTX 1660 Ti to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Radeon R9 295X2 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (320.0GB/s vs 288.0GB/s)
1280 additional rendering cores
GeForce GTX 1660 Ti 's Advantages
Released 4 years and 10 months late
Boost Clock1770MHz
More VRAM (6GB vs 4GB)
Lower TDP (120W vs 500W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Radeon R9 295X2
+5%
5733
GeForce GTX 1660 Ti
5437
Graphics Card
Apr 2014
Release Date
Feb 2019
Volcanic Islands
Generation
GeForce 16
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
1500 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1770 MHz
1250 MHz
Memory Clock
1500 MHz
Memory
4GB
Memory Size
6GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
512bit
Memory Bus
192bit
320.0GB/s
Bandwidth
288.0GB/s
Render Config
44
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
24
2816
Shading Units
1536
176
TMUs
96
64
ROPs
48
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
1024 KB
L2 Cache
1536 KB
Theoretical Performance
65.15 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
84.96 GPixel/s
179.2 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
169.9 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
10.87 TFLOPS
5.733 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
5.437 TFLOPS
716.7 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
169.9 GFLOPS
Board Design
500W
TDP
120W
900 W
Suggested PSU
300 W
1x DVI
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
1x DVI
1x HDMI 2.0
1x DisplayPort 1.4a
2x 8-pin
Power Connectors
1x 8-pin
Graphics Processor
Vesuvius
GPU Name
TU116
Vesuvius XT
(215-0852022)
GPU Variant
TU116-400-A1
GCN 2.0
Architecture
Turing
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
12 nm
6.2 billion
Transistors
6.6 billion
438 mm²
Die Size
284 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (12_0)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
2.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.2
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
7.5
6.3
Shader Model
6.6