Radeon R9 295X2 vs GeForce GTX 1630
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM Radeon R9 295X2 and 4GB VRAM GeForce GTX 1630 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Radeon R9 295X2 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (320.0GB/s vs 96.00GB/s)
2304 additional rendering cores
GeForce GTX 1630 's Advantages
Released 8 years and 2 months late
Boost Clock1785MHz
Lower TDP (75W vs 500W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Radeon R9 295X2
+213%
5733
GeForce GTX 1630
1828
Graphics Card
Apr 2014
Release Date
Jun 2022
Volcanic Islands
Generation
GeForce 16
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
1740 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1785 MHz
1250 MHz
Memory Clock
1500 MHz
Memory
4GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
512bit
Memory Bus
64bit
320.0GB/s
Bandwidth
96.00GB/s
Render Config
44
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
8
2816
Shading Units
512
176
TMUs
32
64
ROPs
16
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
1024 KB
L2 Cache
1024 KB
Theoretical Performance
65.15 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
28.56 GPixel/s
179.2 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
57.12 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
3.656 TFLOPS
5.733 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1.828 TFLOPS
716.7 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
57.12 GFLOPS
Board Design
500W
TDP
75W
900 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
1x DVI
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
1x DVI1x HDMI 2.01x DisplayPort 1.4a
2x 8-pin
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
Vesuvius
GPU Name
TU117
Vesuvius XT
(215-0852022)
GPU Variant
TU117-150-KA-A1
GCN 2.0
Architecture
Turing
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
12 nm
6.2 billion
Transistors
4.7 billion
438 mm²
Die Size
200 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (12_0)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
2.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.2
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
7.5
6.3
Shader Model
6.8
