Radeon R9 295X2 vs Arc Pro A50
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM Radeon R9 295X2 and 6GB VRAM Arc Pro A50 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Radeon R9 295X2 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (320.0GB/s vs 192.0GB/s)
1792 additional rendering cores
Arc Pro A50 's Advantages
Released 8 years and 4 months late
Boost Clock2350MHz
More VRAM (6GB vs 4GB)
Lower TDP (75W vs 500W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Radeon R9 295X2
+19%
5733
Arc Pro A50
4813
Graphics Card
Apr 2014
Release Date
Aug 2022
Volcanic Islands
Generation
Alchemist
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x8
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
2000 MHz
-
Boost Clock
2350 MHz
1250 MHz
Memory Clock
2000 MHz
Memory
4GB
Memory Size
6GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
512bit
Memory Bus
96bit
320.0GB/s
Bandwidth
192.0GB/s
Render Config
44
Compute Units
-
2816
Shading Units
1024
176
TMUs
64
64
ROPs
32
-
RT Cores
8
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
-
1024 KB
L2 Cache
4 MB
Theoretical Performance
65.15 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
75.20 GPixel/s
179.2 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
150.4 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
9.626 TFLOPS
5.733 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
4.813 TFLOPS
716.7 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
1203 GFLOPS
Board Design
500W
TDP
75W
900 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
1x DVI
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
4x mini-DisplayPort 2.0
2x 8-pin
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
Vesuvius
GPU Name
DG2-128
Vesuvius XT
(215-0852022)
GPU Variant
ACM-G11
GCN 2.0
Architecture
Generation 12.7
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
6 nm
6.2 billion
Transistors
7.2 billion
438 mm²
Die Size
157 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (12_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
2.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.2
Vulkan
1.3
6.3
Shader Model
6.6
