Radeon R7 360 vs FirePro 2450 Multi View
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM Radeon R7 360 and 256MB VRAM FirePro 2450 Multi View to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Radeon R7 360 's Advantages
Released 6 years and 5 months late
Boost Clock1050MHz
More VRAM (2GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (96.00GB/s vs 6.400GB/s)
728 additional rendering cores
FirePro 2450 Multi View 's Advantages
Lower TDP (32W vs 100W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Radeon R7 360
+4940%
1613
FirePro 2450 Multi View
32
Graphics Card
Jun 2015
Release Date
Jan 2009
Pirate Islands
Generation
FirePro Multi-View
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1000 MHz
Base Clock
-
1050 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1500 MHz
Memory Clock
400 MHz
Memory
2GB
Memory Size
256MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
DDR3
128bit
Memory Bus
64bit
96.00GB/s
Bandwidth
6.400GB/s
Render Config
12
Compute Units
2
768
Shading Units
40
48
TMUs
4
16
ROPs
4
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
-
256 KB
L2 Cache
-
Theoretical Performance
16.80 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
1.600 GPixel/s
50.40 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
1.600 GTexel/s
1.613 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
32.00 GFLOPS
100.8 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-
Board Design
100W
TDP
32W
300 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
1x DVI
1x HDMI 1.4a
1x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
1x VHDCI
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
Tobago
GPU Name
RV620
Tobago PRO
(215-0875010)
GPU Variant
RV620 PRO
(215-0670006)
GCN 2.0
Architecture
TeraScale
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
55 nm
2.08 billion
Transistors
0.181 billion
160 mm²
Die Size
67 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (12_0)
DirectX
10.1 (10_1)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
2.0
OpenCL
N/A
1.2
Vulkan
N/A
6.3
Shader Model
4.1
