Radeon R7 240 vs FireStream 9270
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM Radeon R7 240 and 2GB VRAM FireStream 9270 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Radeon R7 240 's Advantages
Released 4 years and 11 months late
Boost Clock780MHz
Lower TDP (30W vs 160W)
FireStream 9270 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (115.2GB/s vs 28.80GB/s)
480 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Radeon R7 240
499
FireStream 9270
+140%
1200
Graphics Card
Oct 2013
Release Date
Nov 2008
Volcanic Islands
Generation
FireStream
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x8
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
730 MHz
Base Clock
-
780 MHz
Boost Clock
-
900 MHz
Memory Clock
900 MHz
Memory
2GB
Memory Size
2GB
DDR3
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
256bit
28.80GB/s
Bandwidth
115.2GB/s
Render Config
5
Compute Units
10
320
Shading Units
800
20
TMUs
40
8
ROPs
16
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
256 KB
L2 Cache
256 KB
Theoretical Performance
6.240 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
12.00 GPixel/s
15.60 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
30.00 GTexel/s
499.2 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1200 GFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
240.0 GFLOPS
Board Design
30W
TDP
160W
200 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
1x DVI
1x HDMI 1.4a
1x VGA
Outputs
1x DVI
None
Power Connectors
2x 6-pin
Graphics Processor
Oland
GPU Name
RV770
Oland PRO
(215-0837015)
GPU Variant
RV770 XT
GCN 1.0
Architecture
TeraScale
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
55 nm
0.95 billion
Transistors
0.956 billion
77 mm²
Die Size
256 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (11_1)
DirectX
10.1 (10_1)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
1.2
OpenCL
1.1
1.2
Vulkan
N/A
5.1
Shader Model
4.1
