Radeon R7 240 vs A2
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM Radeon R7 240 and 16GB VRAM A2 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Radeon R7 240 's Advantages
Lower TDP (30W vs 60W)
A2 's Advantages
Released 8 years and 1 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 127% (1770MHz vs 780MHz)
More VRAM (16GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (200.1GB/s vs 28.80GB/s)
960 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Radeon R7 240
499
A2
+808%
4531
Graphics Card
Oct 2013
Release Date
Nov 2021
Volcanic Islands
Generation
Quadro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x8
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x8
Clock Speeds
730 MHz
Base Clock
1440 MHz
780 MHz
Boost Clock
1770 MHz
900 MHz
Memory Clock
1563 MHz
Memory
2GB
Memory Size
16GB
DDR3
Memory Type
GDDR6
128bit
Memory Bus
128bit
28.80GB/s
Bandwidth
200.1GB/s
Render Config
5
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
10
320
Shading Units
1280
20
TMUs
40
8
ROPs
32
-
Tensor Cores
40
-
RT Cores
10
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
256 KB
L2 Cache
2 MB
Theoretical Performance
6.240 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
56.64 GPixel/s
15.60 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
70.80 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
4.531 TFLOPS
499.2 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
4.531 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
70.80 GFLOPS
Board Design
30W
TDP
60W
200 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
1x DVI
1x HDMI 1.4a
1x VGA
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
Oland
GPU Name
GA107
Oland PRO
(215-0837015)
GPU Variant
-
GCN 1.0
Architecture
Ampere
TSMC
Foundry
Samsung
28 nm
Process Size
8 nm
0.95 billion
Transistors
Unknown
77 mm²
Die Size
Unknown
Graphics Features
12 (11_1)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
1.2
OpenCL
3.0
1.2
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
8.6
5.1
Shader Model
6.6